Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
268 kcal
Score
70 / 100
Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal) has a higher nutrition quality score (70) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 268(+1.9%)
Score Diff
6 vs 70(+1066.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal)
Higher energy
Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal)
Score leader
Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal)
Nutrient split
2 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal) has 268.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 70. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 320 µg | +15900.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.43 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.88 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 3840 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 14.9 mg | +86.3% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 25.2 mg | +6200.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 15.5 g | +1309.1% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 280 mg | +3011.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 464.4 mg | +2996.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 52.82 g | -22.3% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 8.37 g | +2690.0% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 349 mg | +5716.7% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 2.4 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 1800 mg | +2237.7% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 11.38 g | +2745.0% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 190 mg | +1483.3% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 8.2 g | -72.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.82 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.45 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 3.73 g | +3630.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.65 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 1.5 mg | +1775.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal).
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 268 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Ahududu reçeli has 2 µg and Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal) has 320 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Stevia Yaprağı (Doğal) 70.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.