Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
290 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Şeker kamışı melası has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 290(+10.3%)
Score Diff
6 vs 42(+600.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Şeker kamışı melası
Higher energy
Şeker kamışı melası
Score leader
Şeker kamışı melası
Nutrient split
3 - 12 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Şeker kamışı melası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Şeker kamışı melası has 290.0 kcal. The difference is 27.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Şeker kamışı melası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.67 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.49 mg | +1125.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 4.72 mg | +1080.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 30 mg | +233.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 205 mg | +1266.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 74.73 g | +9.9% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 3.3 g | +1000.0% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 242 mg | +3933.3% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 1.53 mg | +920.0% |
| Niasin | — | 0.93 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 1464 mg | +1801.3% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.1 g | -75.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 17.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 37 mg | +208.3% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 21.87 g | -27.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.1 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 74.72 g | +23.9% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.29 mg | +262.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Şeker kamışı melası.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 290 kcal).
For measured Magnezyum, Ahududu reçeli has 6 mg and Şeker kamışı melası has 242 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Şeker kamışı melası 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.