Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
242 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Kuşburnu marmeladı has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 242(-8.0%)
Score Diff
6 vs 29(+383.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuşburnu marmeladı
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Kuşburnu marmeladı
Nutrient split
4 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Kuşburnu marmeladı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Kuşburnu marmeladı has 242.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Kuşburnu marmeladı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 43.3 µg | +2065.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.022 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.054 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 520 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 68.5 mg | +756.3% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 1.15 mg | +187.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 4.1 g | +272.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | 242 kcal | -8.0% |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 24 mg | +166.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 62 mg | +313.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 61.2 g | -10.0% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 0.75 g | +150.0% |
| Likopen | — | 1820 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 28 mg | +366.7% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.48 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 245 mg | +218.2% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.95 g | +137.5% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 8 mg | -33.3% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 36.8 g | +21.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.35 g | +250.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 54.6 g | -9.5% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.32 mg | +300.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Kuşburnu marmeladı.
Kuşburnu marmeladı has less energy per 100 g (242 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Ahududu reçeli has 2 µg and Kuşburnu marmeladı has 43.3 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Kuşburnu marmeladı 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.