Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
380.2 kcal
Score
11 / 100
Köme has a higher nutrition quality score (11) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 380.2(+44.6%)
Score Diff
6 vs 11(+83.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Köme
Higher energy
Köme
Score leader
Köme
Nutrient split
3 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Köme are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Köme has 380.2 kcal. The difference is 117.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 11. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Köme | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.35 mg | +775.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 1.9 mg | +375.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 3.2 g | +190.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 115 mg | +1177.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 64 mg | +326.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 58.6 g | -13.8% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 1.5 g | +400.0% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 52 mg | +766.7% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 410 mg | +432.5% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 4.5 g | +1025.0% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 12 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 18 g | -40.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.4 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.6 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 14.2 g | +14100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.8 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 42 g | -30.3% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.9 mg | +1025.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Köme.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 380.2 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Ahududu reçeli has 0.1 g and Köme has 14.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Köme 11.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.