Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
222 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Keçiboynuzu tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 222(-15.6%)
Score Diff
6 vs 26(+333.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Keçiboynuzu tozu
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Keçiboynuzu tozu
Nutrient split
3 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Keçiboynuzu tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Keçiboynuzu tozu has 222.0 kcal. The difference is 41.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Keçiboynuzu tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.053 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.461 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.366 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.57 mg | +1325.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 0.2 mg | -97.5% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 2.94 mg | +635.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 39.8 g | +3518.2% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 79 mg | +777.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 348 mg | +2220.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 88.88 g | +30.7% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 2.27 g | +656.7% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 54 mg | +800.0% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 0.51 mg | +240.0% |
| Niasin | — | 1.897 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 827 mg | +974.0% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 4.62 g | +1055.0% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 35 mg | +191.7% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 3.58 g | -88.1% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 29 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.65 g | +550.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 49.08 g | -18.6% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.92 mg | +1050.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Keçiboynuzu tozu.
Keçiboynuzu tozu has less energy per 100 g (222 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Ahududu reçeli has 1.1 g and Keçiboynuzu tozu has 39.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Keçiboynuzu tozu 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.