Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
120 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 120(-54.4%)
Score Diff
6 vs 45(+650.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Nutrient split
2 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has 120.0 kcal. The difference is 143.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 245 µg | +12150.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.34 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 2680 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 34.5 mg | +331.3% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 2.15 mg | +437.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 4.2 g | +281.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.2 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | 28 µg | +460.0% |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 52 mg | +477.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | 14.5 µg | +1108.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 48 mg | +220.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 10.6 g | -84.4% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 2.95 g | +883.3% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 26 mg | +333.3% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.75 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 410 mg | +432.5% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 2.85 g | +612.5% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 920 mg | +7566.7% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 72 g | +138.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.85 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 7.4 g | +7300.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.12 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 3.6 g | -94.0% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.58 mg | +625.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi.
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has less energy per 100 g (120 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Ahududu reçeli has 2 µg and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has 245 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.