Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
425 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Furikake has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 425(+61.6%)
Score Diff
6 vs 29(+383.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Furikake
Higher energy
Furikake
Score leader
Furikake
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Furikake are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Furikake has 425.0 kcal. The difference is 162.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Furikake | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 145 µg | +7150.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.32 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.85 mg | +2025.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 7.8 mg | +1850.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 9.4 g | +754.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.6 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | 88 µg | +1660.0% |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 420 mg | +4566.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 740 mg | +4833.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 33.2 g | -51.2% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 14.8 g | +4833.3% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 195 mg | +3150.0% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 1.45 mg | +866.7% |
| Niasin | — | 4.8 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 580 mg | +653.2% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 24.5 g | +6025.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 18.6 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 3850 mg | +31983.3% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 4.3 g | -85.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3.4 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 8.6 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 22.8 g | +22700.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.8 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 13.5 g | -77.6% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 3.4 mg | +4150.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Furikake.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 425 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Ahududu reçeli has 12 mg and Furikake has 3850 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Furikake 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.