Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
36 / 100
Ahududu reçeli has a higher nutrition quality score (36) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
151 vs 263(+74.2%)
Score Diff
30 vs 36(+20.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahududu reçeli
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Ahududu reçeli
Nutrient split
4 - 11 (tie: 4)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Cranberry sosu and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Cranberry sosu has 151.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 112.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 36. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Cranberry sosu | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.018 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.025 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.04 mg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.5 mg | 8 mg | +77.8% |
| Demir | 0.26 mg | 0.4 mg | +53.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 1.1 g | 0.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.72 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 632 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 151 kcal | 263 kcal | +74.2% |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 5 mg | 9 mg | +80.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.9 µg | 1.2 µg | -36.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 15 mg | +150.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.9 g | 68 g | +74.8% |
| Kül | 0.25 g | 0.3 g | +20.0% |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 6 mg | +100.0% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 0.15 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 35 mg | 77 mg | +120.0% |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.4 g | +100.0% |
| Sodyum | 24 mg | 12 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 60.3 g | 30.2 g | -49.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.15 g | 0.1 g | -33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 34.6 g | 60.3 g | +74.3% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Cranberry sosu and Ahududu reçeli.
Cranberry sosu has less energy per 100 g (151 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Cranberry sosu has 6 mg and Ahududu reçeli has 15 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Cranberry sosu 30, Ahududu reçeli 36.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.