Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
52.6 vs 46(-12.6%)
Score Diff
52 vs 35(-32.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
17 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Mürdüm Eriği are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 52.6 kcal and Mürdüm Eriği has 46.0 kcal. The difference is 6.6 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 52 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Mürdüm Eriği | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 345 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 17 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.032 mg | 0.028 mg | -12.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.026 mg | -31.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.055 mg | 0.029 mg | -47.3% |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.057 mg | -36.7% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 190 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 26.2 mg | 9.5 mg | -63.7% |
| Demir | 0.69 mg | 0.17 mg | -75.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.5 g | 1.4 g | -78.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.87 mg | 0.26 mg | -70.1% |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 29 mg | 16 mg | -44.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 7.8 µg | 6.4 µg | -17.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 6 mg | -76.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.94 g | 11.42 g | -4.4% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 136 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 7 mg | -68.2% |
| Mangan | 0.67 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.598 mg | 0.417 mg | -30.3% |
| Potasyum | 151 mg | 157 mg | +4.0% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.7 g | -41.7% |
| Su | 85.75 g | 87.23 g | +1.7% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 5 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.65 g | 0.28 g | -56.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.42 g | 9.92 g | +124.4% |
| Çinko | 0.42 mg | 0.1 mg | -76.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Mürdüm Eriği.
Mürdüm Eriği has less energy per 100 g (46 kcal versus 52.6 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 4.42 g and Mürdüm Eriği has 9.92 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 52, Mürdüm Eriği 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.