Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Energy
170 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
170 vs 140(-17.6%)
Score Diff
52 vs 46(-11.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü
Higher energy
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü
Score leader
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü
Nutrient split
31 - 23 (tie: 11)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü and Lau Lau are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü has 170.0 kcal and Lau Lau has 140.0 kcal. The difference is 30.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 52 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü | Lau Lau | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 5 µg | -86.8% |
| Alfa Karoten | 33 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.18 mg | +350.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 9.69 µg | 0.78 µg | -92.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.12 mg | +200.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.24 mg | 0.21 mg | -12.5% |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | 0.04 mg | -85.7% |
| Besin folati | 18 µg | 3 µg | -83.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 149 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8.9 mg | 0.1 mg | -98.9% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 1.7 µg | — |
| Demir | 3.3 mg | 0.52 mg | -84.2% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.05 g | 0.05 g | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.26 mg | 0.37 mg | -88.7% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 170 kj | 140 kj | -17.6% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.05 g | 0.07 g | +40.0% |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 18 µg | 3 µg | -83.3% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 107 mg | 197 mg | +84.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 6.1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 44 mg | 14 mg | -68.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.56 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 29 mg | 57 mg | +96.6% |
| Likopen | 845 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 43 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 18 mg | -25.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.16 g | 0.23 g | +43.8% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 7.57 g | 3.08 g | -59.3% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.05 g | 0.08 g | +60.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Niasin | 1.25 mg | 2.73 mg | +118.4% |
| Potasyum | 297 mg | 223 mg | -24.9% |
| Protein | 9.67 g | 15.25 g | +57.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.03 g | 0.77 g | -25.2% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.07 g | 0.05 g | -28.6% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.03 g | 0.07 g | +133.3% |
| Retinol | 25 µg | 5 µg | -80.0% |
| Selenyum | 27.3 µg | 27.4 µg | +0.4% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0.13 g | +550.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.48 g | 1.7 g | +14.9% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.33 g | 0.87 g | +163.6% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 129 mg | 231 mg | +79.1% |
| Su | 71.33 g | 74.98 g | +5.1% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.9 g | 2.67 g | +40.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 18 µg | 3 µg | -83.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 43.4 mg | 47.9 mg | +10.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.79 g | 3.3 g | -57.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 11.95 g | 8.32 g | -30.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.24 g | 1.04 g | -16.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.13 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 1.13 mg | 1.26 mg | +11.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü and Lau Lau.
Lau Lau has less energy per 100 g (140 kcal versus 170 kcal).
For measured SFA 14:0, Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü has 0.02 g and Lau Lau has 0.13 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahtapot Salata, Porto Riko usulü 52, Lau Lau 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.