Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ahtapot (Izgara) has a higher nutrition quality score (84) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
164 vs 143(-12.8%)
Score Diff
84 vs 63(-25.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Higher energy
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Score leader
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Nutrient split
9 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahtapot (Izgara) and Uçan balık yumurtası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 164.0 kcal and Uçan balık yumurtası has 143.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 84 and 63. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahtapot (Izgara) | Uçan balık yumurtası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 90 µg | 90 µg | 0.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 36 µg | 10 µg | -72.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.74 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 10 µg | — |
| Demir | 9.54 mg | 1.2 mg | -87.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.85 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.1 mg | 2.7 mg | +28.6% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.62 g | — |
| Fosfor | 279 mg | 402 mg | +44.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 106 mg | 40 mg | -62.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.4 g | 1.5 g | -65.9% |
| Kolesterol | 96 mg | 300 mg | +212.5% |
| Kül | 3.2 g | 5.7 g | +78.1% |
| Magnezyum | 60 mg | 20 mg | -66.7% |
| Niasin | 3.78 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 630 mg | 220 mg | -65.1% |
| Protein | 29.82 g | 22.3 g | -25.2% |
| Selenyum | 89.6 µg | 40 µg | -55.4% |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 1500 mg | +226.1% |
| Su | 60.5 g | 64.1 g | +6.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.32 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 2.08 g | 6.4 g | +207.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.51 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.36 mg | 1 mg | -70.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahtapot (Izgara) and Uçan balık yumurtası.
Uçan balık yumurtası has less energy per 100 g (143 kcal versus 164 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 460 mg and Uçan balık yumurtası has 1500 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahtapot (Izgara) 84, Uçan balık yumurtası 63.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.