Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
57 kcal
Score
19 / 100
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has a higher nutrition quality score (28) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
68 vs 57(-16.2%)
Score Diff
28 vs 19(-32.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu)
Higher energy
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu)
Score leader
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu)
Nutrient split
15 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Williams armudu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 68.0 kcal and Williams armudu has 57.0 kcal. The difference is 11.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 28 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) | Williams armudu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.029 mg | -42.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.082 mg | +2.5% |
| Beta Karoten | 35 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 7.5 mg | 4.3 mg | -42.7% |
| Demir | 0.5 mg | 0.18 mg | -64.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.2 g | 3.1 g | -50.0% |
| Fosfor | 16 mg | 12 mg | -25.0% |
| Fruktoz | — | 6.23 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 2.81 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 9 mg | -59.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.5 g | 15.23 g | -13.0% |
| Kül | 0.6 g | 0.31 g | -48.3% |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 7 mg | -36.4% |
| Mangan | — | 0.048 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 116 mg | -20.0% |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.36 g | -40.0% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | — | — |
| Su | 79.5 g | 83.96 g | +5.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | 7 µg | -12.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.14 g | -53.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.8 g | 9.75 g | -0.5% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.1 mg | -50.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Williams armudu.
Williams armudu has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 68 kcal).
For measured Demir, Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 0.5 mg and Williams armudu has 0.18 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) 28, Williams armudu 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.