Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
56 kcal
Score
48 / 100
Kırmızı frenk üzümü has a higher nutrition quality score (48) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
68 vs 56(-17.6%)
Score Diff
28 vs 48(+71.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kırmızı frenk üzümü
Higher energy
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu)
Score leader
Kırmızı frenk üzümü
Nutrient split
6 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Kırmızı frenk üzümü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 68.0 kcal and Kırmızı frenk üzümü has 56.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 28 and 48. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) | Kırmızı frenk üzümü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.04 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.05 mg | +25.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.07 mg | +40.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.107 mg | +33.8% |
| Beta Karoten | 35 µg | 25 µg | -28.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 7.5 mg | 41 mg | +446.7% |
| Demir | 0.5 mg | 1 mg | +100.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.2 g | 4.3 g | -30.6% |
| Fosfor | 16 mg | 44 mg | +175.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 11 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 33 mg | +50.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.5 g | 13.8 g | -21.1% |
| Kül | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 13 mg | +18.2% |
| Mangan | — | 0.186 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.35 mg | 0.1 mg | -71.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.064 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 275 mg | +89.7% |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1.4 g | +133.3% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | — | — |
| Su | 79.5 g | 83.95 g | +5.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.8 g | 7.37 g | -24.8% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Kırmızı frenk üzümü.
Kırmızı frenk üzümü has less energy per 100 g (56 kcal versus 68 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 7.5 mg and Kırmızı frenk üzümü has 41 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) 28, Kırmızı frenk üzümü 48.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.