Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
120 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
310 vs 120(-61.3%)
Score Diff
1 vs 45(+4400.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Higher energy
Agave nektarı
Score leader
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Nutrient split
2 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Agave nektarı and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Agave nektarı has 310.0 kcal and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has 120.0 kcal. The difference is 190.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 1 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Agave nektarı | Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 245 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.015 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.014 mg | 0.34 mg | +2328.6% |
| Bakir | 0.033 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 2680 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 34.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.11 mg | 2.15 mg | +1854.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 4.2 g | +2000.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.2 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 1 µg | 28 µg | +2700.0% |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 52 mg | +5100.0% |
| Fruktoz | 55.6 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 12.43 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 14.5 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 48 mg | +4700.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 76.37 g | 10.6 g | -86.1% |
| Kül | 0.14 g | 2.95 g | +2007.1% |
| Magnezyum | 1 mg | 26 mg | +2500.0% |
| Mangan | 0.041 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.75 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 4 mg | 410 mg | +10150.0% |
| Protein | 0.09 g | 2.85 g | +3066.7% |
| Selenyum | 0.7 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 920 mg | +22900.0% |
| Su | 22.95 g | 72 g | +213.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.85 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.45 g | 7.4 g | +1544.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.12 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 68.03 g | 3.6 g | -94.7% |
| Çinko | 0.09 mg | 0.58 mg | +544.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Agave nektarı and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi.
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has less energy per 100 g (120 kcal versus 310 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Agave nektarı has 4 mg and Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has 920 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Agave nektarı 1, Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.