Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
174 kcal
Score
36 / 100
Keşkek has a higher nutrition quality score (36) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
412 vs 174(-57.8%)
Score Diff
35 vs 36(+2.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Keşkek
Higher energy
Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Keşkek
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Keşkek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 412.0 kcal and Keşkek has 174.0 kcal. The difference is 238.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 36. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Keşkek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 34 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.28 mg | 0.12 mg | -57.1% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.15 µg | 0.55 µg | -74.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.23 mg | 0.09 mg | -60.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.36 mg | 0.16 mg | -55.6% |
| Demir | 2.85 mg | 1.6 mg | -43.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.6 g | 2.9 g | +383.3% |
| Folat DFE | — | 26 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 215 mg | 128 mg | -40.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 32 mg | 24 mg | -25.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.9 g | 18.7 g | +884.2% |
| Kolesterol | 86 mg | 22 mg | -74.4% |
| Kül | 4.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 32 mg | +52.4% |
| Niasin | 4.2 mg | 2.4 mg | -42.9% |
| Potasyum | 355 mg | 195 mg | -45.1% |
| Protein | 19.8 g | 8.4 g | -57.6% |
| Sodyum | 1580 mg | 310 mg | -80.4% |
| Su | 37.2 g | 66.8 g | +79.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 16.6 g | 3.4 g | -79.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 15.3 g | 2.9 g | -81.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 36.4 g | 7.3 g | -79.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 0.6 g | -71.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.95 mg | 1.85 mg | -53.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Keşkek.
Keşkek has less energy per 100 g (174 kcal versus 412 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 1.9 g and Keşkek has 18.7 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afyon Sucuğu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 35, Keşkek 36.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.