Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
149 kcal
Score
44 / 100
Afrika patlıcanı has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 149(+432.1%)
Score Diff
71 vs 44(-38.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Afrika patlıcanı
Higher energy
Taze Sarımsak
Score leader
Afrika patlıcanı
Nutrient split
3 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afrika patlıcanı and Taze Sarımsak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal and Taze Sarımsak has 149.0 kcal. The difference is 121.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 44. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afrika patlıcanı | Taze Sarımsak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.2 mg | +300.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.11 mg | +175.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 1.235 mg | +1443.8% |
| Bakir | — | 0.3 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 60 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5 mg | 31.2 mg | +524.0% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 1.7 mg | +183.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 2.1 g | -16.0% |
| Enerji | 117 kj | 623 kj | +432.5% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 149 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 22 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 153 mg | +537.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 181 mg | +905.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.9 g | 33.06 g | +460.3% |
| Kül | — | 1.5 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 25 mg | +56.3% |
| Mangan | — | 1.67 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 0.7 mg | +16.7% |
| Potasyum | 230 mg | 401 mg | +74.3% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 6.36 g | +430.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 14.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 17 mg | +466.7% |
| Su | 91.2 g | 58.58 g | -35.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.089 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 3 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.5 g | +150.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.8 g | 1 g | -64.3% |
| Çinko | 0.17 mg | 1.16 mg | +582.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afrika patlıcanı and Taze Sarımsak.
Afrika patlıcanı has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 149 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Afrika patlıcanı has 0.08 mg and Taze Sarımsak has 1.235 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afrika patlıcanı 71, Taze Sarımsak 44.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.