Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
16 kcal
Score
95 / 100
Nopal kaktüsü has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 16(-42.9%)
Score Diff
71 vs 95(+33.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Nopal kaktüsü
Higher energy
Afrika patlıcanı
Score leader
Nopal kaktüsü
Nutrient split
9 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afrika patlıcanı and Nopal kaktüsü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal and Nopal kaktüsü has 16.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 95. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afrika patlıcanı | Nopal kaktüsü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5 µg | 23 µg | +360.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.014 mg | -72.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.041 mg | +2.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 0.07 mg | -12.5% |
| Bakir | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 60 µg | 250 µg | +316.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5 mg | 9.3 mg | +86.0% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 0.59 mg | -1.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 2.2 g | -12.0% |
| Enerji | 117 kj | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 22 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 16 mg | -33.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 5.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 164 mg | +811.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.9 g | 3.33 g | -43.6% |
| Kül | — | 1.14 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 52 mg | +225.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.46 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 0.41 mg | -31.7% |
| Potasyum | 230 mg | 257 mg | +11.7% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.32 g | +10.0% |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 21 mg | +600.0% |
| Su | 91.2 g | 94.12 g | +3.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 3 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.09 g | -55.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.8 g | 1.15 g | -58.9% |
| Çinko | 0.17 mg | 0.2 mg | +17.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afrika patlıcanı and Nopal kaktüsü.
Nopal kaktüsü has less energy per 100 g (16 kcal versus 28 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Afrika patlıcanı has 18 mg and Nopal kaktüsü has 164 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afrika patlıcanı 71, Nopal kaktüsü 95.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.