Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
37 kcal
Score
95 / 100
Çiriş Otu has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 37(+32.1%)
Score Diff
71 vs 95(+33.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çiriş Otu
Higher energy
Çiriş Otu
Score leader
Çiriş Otu
Nutrient split
1 - 18 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afrika patlıcanı and Çiriş Otu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal and Çiriş Otu has 37.0 kcal. The difference is 9.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 95. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afrika patlıcanı | Çiriş Otu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5 µg | 154 µg | +2980.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.07 mg | +40.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.11 mg | +175.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 60 µg | 1850 µg | +2983.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5 mg | 46 mg | +820.0% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 2.35 mg | +291.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 2.8 g | +12.0% |
| Enerji | 117 kj | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 22 µg | 48 µg | +118.2% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 44 mg | +83.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 112 mg | +522.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.9 g | 6.2 g | +5.1% |
| Kül | — | 1.1 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 27 mg | +68.8% |
| Mangan | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 0.68 mg | +13.3% |
| Potasyum | 230 mg | 345 mg | +50.0% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.1 g | +75.0% |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 16 mg | +433.3% |
| Su | 91.2 g | 89.2 g | -2.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.4 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.17 mg | 0.58 mg | +241.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afrika patlıcanı and Çiriş Otu.
Afrika patlıcanı has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 37 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Afrika patlıcanı has 60 µg and Çiriş Otu has 1850 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afrika patlıcanı 71, Çiriş Otu 95.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.