Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
352 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Yeşil Mercimek has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
329 vs 352(+7.0%)
Score Diff
41 vs 42(+2.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil Mercimek
Higher energy
Yeşil Mercimek
Score leader
Yeşil Mercimek
Nutrient split
11 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adzuki fasulyesi and Yeşil Mercimek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal and Yeşil Mercimek has 352.0 kcal. The difference is 23.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adzuki fasulyesi | Yeşil Mercimek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.455 mg | 0.87 mg | +91.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.21 mg | -4.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.351 mg | 0.54 mg | +53.8% |
| Bakir | 1.09 mg | 0.52 mg | -52.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.98 mg | 7.54 mg | +51.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.7 g | 10.7 g | -15.7% |
| Folat DFE | — | 479 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 381 mg | 451 mg | +18.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 66 mg | 56 mg | -15.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.96 g | 63.35 g | +0.6% |
| Kül | 3.82 g | 2.5 g | -34.6% |
| Magnezyum | 127 mg | 122 mg | -3.9% |
| Mangan | 1.73 mg | 1.35 mg | -22.0% |
| Niasin | 2.63 mg | 2.6 mg | -1.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.47 mg | 1.7 mg | +15.6% |
| Potasyum | 1254 mg | 955 mg | -23.8% |
| Protein | 19.87 g | 24.63 g | +24.0% |
| Selenyum | 3.2 µg | 11 µg | +243.8% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 6 mg | +20.0% |
| Su | 16.32 g | 8.46 g | -48.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.15 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 622 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.17 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.53 g | 1.06 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.53 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.03 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.04 mg | 4.78 mg | -5.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adzuki fasulyesi and Yeşil Mercimek.
Adzuki fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (329 kcal versus 352 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Adzuki fasulyesi has 3.2 µg and Yeşil Mercimek has 11 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adzuki fasulyesi 41, Yeşil Mercimek 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.