Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
105 kcal
Score
33 / 100
Adzuki fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
329 vs 105(-68.1%)
Score Diff
41 vs 33(-19.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adzuki fasulyesi
Higher energy
Adzuki fasulyesi
Score leader
Adzuki fasulyesi
Nutrient split
17 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adzuki fasulyesi and Moong dal are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal and Moong dal has 105.0 kcal. The difference is 224.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 33. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adzuki fasulyesi | Moong dal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.455 mg | 0.164 mg | -64.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.062 mg | -71.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.351 mg | 0.083 mg | -76.4% |
| Bakir | 1.09 mg | 0.174 mg | -84.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.98 mg | 1.37 mg | -72.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.7 g | 7.6 g | -40.2% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 105 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 381 mg | 140 mg | -63.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 66 mg | 27 mg | -59.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.96 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 19.15 g | — |
| Kül | 3.82 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 127 mg | 48 mg | -62.2% |
| Mangan | 1.73 mg | 0.252 mg | -85.4% |
| Niasin | 2.63 mg | 0.598 mg | -77.3% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.47 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1254 mg | 266 mg | -78.8% |
| Protein | 19.87 g | 7.02 g | -64.7% |
| Selenyum | 3.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 2 mg | -60.0% |
| Su | 16.32 g | 70.08 g | +329.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 622 µg | 159 µg | -74.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.53 g | 0.38 g | -28.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.3 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.04 mg | 0.63 mg | -87.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adzuki fasulyesi and Moong dal.
Moong dal has less energy per 100 g (105 kcal versus 329 kcal).
For measured Su, Adzuki fasulyesi has 16.32 g and Moong dal has 70.08 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adzuki fasulyesi 41, Moong dal 33.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.