Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
295 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Adana kebabı has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
268.8 vs 295(+9.8%)
Score Diff
42 vs 10(-76.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adana kebabı
Higher energy
Perde pilavı
Score leader
Adana kebabı
Nutrient split
13 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adana kebabı and Perde pilavı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adana kebabı has 268.8 kcal and Perde pilavı has 295.0 kcal. The difference is 26.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adana kebabı | Perde pilavı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 42 µg | +50.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.1 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | 0.16 mg | -50.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.9 mg | 1.25 mg | -34.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.4 g | 1.8 g | +350.0% |
| Fosfor | 165 mg | 130 mg | -21.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 38 mg | +137.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.2 g | 33.5 g | +2691.7% |
| Kolesterol | 75 mg | 32 mg | -57.3% |
| Kül | 1.9 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 26 mg | +44.4% |
| Niasin | 4.8 mg | 2.3 mg | -52.1% |
| Potasyum | 265 mg | 185 mg | -30.2% |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 9.5 g | -42.4% |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 310 mg | -32.6% |
| Su | 55.4 g | 40.2 g | -27.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 10.2 g | 4.8 g | -52.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 24 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.1 g | 5.5 g | -39.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 22 g | 13.5 g | -38.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 2.1 g | +90.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.6 mg | 1.15 mg | -68.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adana kebabı and Perde pilavı.
Adana kebabı has less energy per 100 g (268.8 kcal versus 295 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Adana kebabı has 1.2 g and Perde pilavı has 33.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adana kebabı 42, Perde pilavı 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.