Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
16.4 kcal
Score
53 / 100
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 16.4(+1540.0%)
Score Diff
100 vs 53(-47.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Higher energy
Kombucha (Zencefilli)
Score leader
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Nutrient split
1 - 17 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Kombucha (Zencefilli) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 1.0 kcal and Kombucha (Zencefilli) has 16.4 kcal. The difference is 15.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 53. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Tıbbi) | Kombucha (Zencefilli) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.004 mg | 0.025 mg | +525.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.18 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.008 mg | 0.045 mg | +462.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.052 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.2 mg | 2.4 mg | +1100.0% |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 0.09 mg | +12.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.05 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 1 kcal | — | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0.28 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 4.2 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 7.5 mg | +650.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 3.4 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 3 mg | 11.4 mg | +280.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.2 g | 3.85 g | +1825.0% |
| Kül | 0.1 g | 0.16 g | +60.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 4.1 mg | +105.0% |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | — | 0.32 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 14 mg | 38 mg | +171.4% |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.12 g | +20.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 6.8 mg | +580.0% |
| Su | 99.6 g | 95.2 g | -4.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0.02 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 3.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.04 mg | +33.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Kombucha (Zencefilli).
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 16.4 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 0.2 g and Kombucha (Zencefilli) has 3.85 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Tıbbi) 100, Kombucha (Zencefilli) 53.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.