Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
268 kcal
Score
61 / 100
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 268(+26700.0%)
Score Diff
100 vs 61(-39.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Higher energy
Ihlamur Çiçeği
Score leader
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Nutrient split
1 - 19 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Ihlamur Çiçeği are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 1.0 kcal and Ihlamur Çiçeği has 268.0 kcal. The difference is 267.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 61. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Tıbbi) | Ihlamur Çiçeği | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.004 mg | 0.18 mg | +4400.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.008 mg | 0.35 mg | +4275.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.22 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.72 mg | +7100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.2 mg | 24 mg | +11900.0% |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 10.5 mg | +13025.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 39.5 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 1 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 140 mg | +13900.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 3 mg | 620 mg | +20566.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.2 g | 66.2 g | +33000.0% |
| Kül | 0.1 g | 6 g | +5900.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 135 mg | +6650.0% |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | 4.8 mg | +5900.0% |
| Niasin | — | 1.45 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 14 mg | 950 mg | +6685.7% |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 7.4 g | +7300.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 15 mg | +1400.0% |
| Su | 99.6 g | 9.8 g | -90.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.65 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | 45 µg | +4400.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.42 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 2.6 g | — |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.15 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 4.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 2.1 mg | +6900.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Ihlamur Çiçeği.
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 268 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 0.2 g and Ihlamur Çiçeği has 66.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Tıbbi) 100, Ihlamur Çiçeği 61.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.