Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
241 kcal
Score
78 / 100
Papatya Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 241(-23.5%)
Score Diff
76 vs 78(+2.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Papatya Tozu
Higher energy
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Score leader
Papatya Tozu
Nutrient split
10 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Papatya Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Papatya Tozu has 241.0 kcal. The difference is 74.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 78. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Papatya Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | 0.15 mg | -80.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | 0.4 mg | +17.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | 0.45 mg | -83.3% |
| Bakir | — | 1.1 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 350 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | 18 mg | -42.7% |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 22.5 mg | -20.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 41.2 g | +2.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 190 mg | +108.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 750 mg | -54.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 67.8 g | +11.6% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | 8 g | +0.9% |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 240 mg | -43.9% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | 4.5 mg | +43.8% |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | 1.2 mg | -79.0% |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 1600 mg | +49.5% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 9.6 g | -9.7% |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 78 mg | +609.1% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 8 g | +0.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 120 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 3.4 g | -73.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 3.2 mg | -31.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Papatya Tozu.
Papatya Tozu has less energy per 100 g (241 kcal versus 315 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 11 mg and Papatya Tozu has 78 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Papatya Tozu 78.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.