Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
480 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Adaçayı (Kuru) has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 480(+52.4%)
Score Diff
76 vs 57(-25.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Higher energy
Kereviz tohumu
Score leader
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Nutrient split
13 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Kereviz tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Kereviz tohumu has 480.0 kcal. The difference is 165.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
25 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Kereviz tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | 0.41 mg | -45.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | 0.22 mg | -35.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | 0.5 mg | -81.4% |
| Bakir | — | 0.4 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | 7.1 mg | -77.4% |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 41.6 mg | +47.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 11.6 g | -71.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | 0.9 mg | -88.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 480 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | 245 µg | -10.6% |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 454 mg | +398.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | 29.3 µg | -98.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 1240 mg | -24.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 44 g | -27.5% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 297 mg | -30.6% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | 8.6 mg | +174.8% |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | 4.1 mg | -28.3% |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 1300 mg | +21.5% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 17.8 g | +67.5% |
| Selenyum | — | 6.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 160 mg | +1354.5% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 8.04 g | +1.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | 2.1 g | -70.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | 11.2 g | +498.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 25.2 g | +97.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | 7 g | +297.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | 2.9 g | +69.6% |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 5.8 mg | +23.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Kereviz tohumu.
Adaçayı (Kuru) has less energy per 100 g (315 kcal versus 480 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 11 mg and Kereviz tohumu has 160 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Kereviz tohumu 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.