Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
323 kcal
Score
51 / 100
Adaçayı (Kuru) has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 323(+2.5%)
Score Diff
76 vs 51(-32.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Higher energy
Çemen Otu Tohumu
Score leader
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Nutrient split
14 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Çemen Otu Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Çemen Otu Tohumu has 323.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 51. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Çemen Otu Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 60 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | 0.322 mg | -57.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | 0.366 mg | +7.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | 0.6 mg | -77.7% |
| Bakir | — | 1.11 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | 3 mg | -90.4% |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 33.53 mg | +19.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 24.6 g | -39.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 1351 kj | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 296 mg | +225.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 176 mg | -89.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 58.35 g | -3.9% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | 3.4 g | -57.1% |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 191 mg | -55.4% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | 1.23 mg | -60.7% |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | 1.64 mg | -71.3% |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 770 mg | -28.0% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 23 g | +116.4% |
| Selenyum | — | 6.3 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 67 mg | +509.1% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 8.84 g | +11.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | 1.46 g | -79.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 57 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 6.41 g | -49.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 2.5 mg | -46.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Çemen Otu Tohumu.
Adaçayı (Kuru) has less energy per 100 g (315 kcal versus 323 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 11 mg and Çemen Otu Tohumu has 67 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Çemen Otu Tohumu 51.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.