Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
71 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Kumkuat (Kamkat) has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 71(-74.4%)
Score Diff
14 vs 43(+207.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kumkuat (Kamkat)
Higher energy
Acve Hurması
Score leader
Kumkuat (Kamkat)
Nutrient split
15 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acve Hurması and Kumkuat (Kamkat) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acve Hurması has 277.0 kcal and Kumkuat (Kamkat) has 71.0 kcal. The difference is 206.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acve Hurması | Kumkuat (Kamkat) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 290 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 15 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.037 mg | -26.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.09 mg | +50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.036 mg | -85.6% |
| Bakir | 0.36 mg | 0.095 mg | -73.6% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 155 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.4 mg | 43.9 mg | +10875.0% |
| Demir | 1 mg | 0.86 mg | -14.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 6.5 g | -7.1% |
| Fosfor | 62 mg | 19 mg | -69.4% |
| Fruktoz | 31.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 31.8 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 64 mg | 62 mg | -3.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 75 g | 15.9 g | -78.8% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 129 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 20 mg | -63.0% |
| Mangan | 0.26 mg | 0.135 mg | -48.1% |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | 0.429 mg | -73.2% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.208 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 656 mg | 186 mg | -71.6% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 1.88 g | -24.8% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 10 mg | +900.0% |
| Su | 21.3 g | 80.85 g | +279.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.103 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 17 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 8.4 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.154 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.86 g | +115.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.171 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 63.3 g | 9.36 g | -85.2% |
| Çinko | 0.44 mg | 0.17 mg | -61.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acve Hurması and Kumkuat (Kamkat).
Kumkuat (Kamkat) has less energy per 100 g (71 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acve Hurması has 0.4 mg and Kumkuat (Kamkat) has 43.9 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acve Hurması 14, Kumkuat (Kamkat) 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.