Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
18 / 100
Kokulu üzüm has a higher nutrition quality score (18) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 69(-75.1%)
Score Diff
14 vs 18(+28.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kokulu üzüm
Higher energy
Acve Hurması
Score leader
Kokulu üzüm
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acve Hurması and Kokulu üzüm are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acve Hurması has 277.0 kcal and Kokulu üzüm has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 208.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 18. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acve Hurması | Kokulu üzüm | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 3 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.069 mg | +38.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.07 mg | +16.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.086 mg | -65.6% |
| Bakir | 0.36 mg | 0.121 mg | -66.4% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 30 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.4 mg | 4 mg | +900.0% |
| Demir | 1 mg | 0.29 mg | -71.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 0.9 g | -87.1% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 69 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 4 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 62 mg | 20 mg | -67.7% |
| Fruktoz | 31.5 g | 8.1 g | -74.3% |
| Glikoz | 31.8 g | 7.21 g | -77.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 14.6 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 64 mg | 10 mg | -84.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 75 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 18.1 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 72 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 7 mg | -87.0% |
| Mangan | 0.26 mg | 0.071 mg | -72.7% |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 656 mg | 191 mg | -70.9% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0.72 g | -71.2% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0.17 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 21.3 g | 81.3 g | +281.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.16 g | -60.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 63.3 g | 15.48 g | -75.5% |
| Çinko | 0.44 mg | 0.07 mg | -84.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acve Hurması and Kokulu üzüm.
Kokulu üzüm has less energy per 100 g (69 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acve Hurması has 0.4 mg and Kokulu üzüm has 4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acve Hurması 14, Kokulu üzüm 18.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.