Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
44 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 44(+193.3%)
Score Diff
85 vs 100(+17.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
1 - 19 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 44.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 4054 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 203 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.078 mg | +188.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.175 mg | +430.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.158 mg | +295.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | 0.24 mg | +485.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | 1620 µg | +3500.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 13.3 mg | +375.0% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 11.87 mg | +4139.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 6.8 g | +1260.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 60 mg | +150.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 199 mg | +1143.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 8.41 g | +131.7% |
| Kül | — | 2.02 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 63 mg | +384.6% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | 1.12 mg | +1317.7% |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.948 mg | +867.3% |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 458 mg | +211.6% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 3.29 g | +406.2% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 31 mg | +1450.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 85.55 g | -10.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 105 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.73 g | +563.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 1.09 mg | +445.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 44 kcal).
For measured Demir, Acur has 0.28 mg and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 11.87 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.