Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
44 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Taze Nane has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 44(+193.3%)
Score Diff
85 vs 100(+17.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Nane
Higher energy
Taze Nane
Score leader
Taze Nane
Nutrient split
1 - 20 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Taze Nane are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Taze Nane has 44.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Taze Nane | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 203 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.08 mg | +196.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.18 mg | +445.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.16 mg | +300.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | 0.24 mg | +485.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | 2434 µg | +5308.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 13.3 mg | +375.0% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 11.87 mg | +4139.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 6.8 g | +1260.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 105 µg | +1400.0% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 60 mg | +150.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 199 mg | +1143.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 8.41 g | +131.7% |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 63 mg | +384.6% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | 1.12 mg | +1317.7% |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.95 mg | +869.4% |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 458 mg | +211.6% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 3.29 g | +406.2% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 31 mg | +1450.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 85.55 g | -10.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.73 g | +563.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 1.09 mg | +445.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Taze Nane.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 44 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Acur has 45 µg and Taze Nane has 2434 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Taze Nane 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Acur · Taze Nane · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.