Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
131 kcal
Score
76 / 100
Acur has a higher nutrition quality score (85) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 131(+773.3%)
Score Diff
85 vs 76(-10.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acur
Higher energy
Taze Biberiye
Score leader
Acur
Nutrient split
1 - 19 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Taze Biberiye are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Taze Biberiye has 131.0 kcal. The difference is 116.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 76. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Taze Biberiye | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 2924 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 146 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.036 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.152 mg | +360.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.336 mg | +740.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | 0.301 mg | +634.1% |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 21.8 mg | +678.6% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 6.65 mg | +2275.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 14.1 g | +2720.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 109 µg | +1457.1% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 66 mg | +175.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 317 mg | +1881.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 20.7 g | +470.2% |
| Kül | — | 2.33 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 91 mg | +600.0% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | 0.96 mg | +1115.2% |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.912 mg | +830.6% |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 668 mg | +354.4% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 3.31 g | +409.2% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 26 mg | +1200.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 67.77 g | -28.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.84 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.16 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 5.86 g | +5227.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.9 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.93 mg | +365.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Taze Biberiye.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 131 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Acur has 0.11 g and Taze Biberiye has 5.86 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Taze Biberiye 76.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.