Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
22 kcal
Score
98 / 100
Tatsoi Yeşilliği has a higher nutrition quality score (98) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 22(+46.7%)
Score Diff
85 vs 98(+15.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tatsoi Yeşilliği
Higher energy
Tatsoi Yeşilliği
Score leader
Tatsoi Yeşilliği
Nutrient split
3 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Tatsoi Yeşilliği are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Tatsoi Yeşilliği has 22.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 98. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Tatsoi Yeşilliği | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 315 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.08 mg | +196.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.12 mg | +263.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.16 mg | +300.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | 3780 µg | +8300.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 89 mg | +3078.6% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 1.5 mg | +435.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 1.8 g | +260.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.9 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 42 mg | +75.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | 195 µg | +1089.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 180 mg | +1025.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 2.8 g | -22.9% |
| Kül | — | 1.3 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 5400 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 19 mg | +46.2% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 390 mg | +165.3% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 2.1 g | +223.1% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 48 mg | +2300.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 93.5 g | -1.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 75 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.3 g | +172.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | 1 g | -40.1% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.35 mg | +75.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Tatsoi Yeşilliği.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 22 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Acur has 45 µg and Tatsoi Yeşilliği has 3780 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Tatsoi Yeşilliği 98.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.