Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
16 kcal
Score
92 / 100
Sarı kabak has a higher nutrition quality score (92) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 16(+6.7%)
Score Diff
85 vs 92(+8.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sarı kabak
Higher energy
Sarı kabak
Score leader
Sarı kabak
Nutrient split
4 - 19 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Sarı kabak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Sarı kabak has 16.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 92. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Sarı kabak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 10 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.045 mg | +66.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.042 mg | +27.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.163 mg | +307.5% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | 0.05 mg | +22.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | 120 µg | +166.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 17 mg | +507.1% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 0.37 mg | +32.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 1.1 g | +120.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 16 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 24 µg | +242.9% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 38 mg | +58.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | 4.3 µg | -73.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 15 mg | -6.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 3.35 g | -7.7% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 2125 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 18 mg | +38.5% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | 0.174 mg | +120.3% |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.487 mg | +396.9% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.161 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 261 mg | +77.6% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 1.21 g | +86.2% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 8 mg | +300.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 94.64 g | -0.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.18 g | +63.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | 2.2 g | +31.7% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.29 mg | +45.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Sarı kabak.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 16 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acur has 2.8 mg and Sarı kabak has 17 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Sarı kabak 92.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.