Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
13 kcal
Score
88 / 100
Napa lahanası has a higher nutrition quality score (88) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 13(-13.3%)
Score Diff
85 vs 88(+3.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Napa lahanası
Higher energy
Acur
Score leader
Napa lahanası
Nutrient split
3 - 18 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Napa lahanası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Napa lahanası has 13.0 kcal. The difference is 2.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 88. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Napa lahanası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.04 mg | +48.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.06 mg | +81.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.12 mg | +200.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | 260 µg | +477.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 27 mg | +864.3% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 0.3 mg | +7.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 1.5 g | +200.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 13 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 79 µg | +1028.6% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 29 mg | +20.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | 42.9 µg | +161.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 40 mg | +150.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 2.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 10 mg | -23.1% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | 0.14 mg | +77.2% |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.4 mg | +308.2% |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 252 mg | +71.4% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 1.2 g | +84.6% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 9 mg | +350.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 95 g | -0.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 11.5 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.2 g | +81.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | 1.2 g | -28.1% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.21 mg | +5.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Napa lahanası.
Napa lahanası has less energy per 100 g (13 kcal versus 15 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Acur has 7 µg and Napa lahanası has 79 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Napa lahanası 88.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.