Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
47 kcal
Score
65 / 100
Acur has a higher nutrition quality score (85) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 47(+213.3%)
Score Diff
85 vs 65(-23.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acur
Higher energy
Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi
Score leader
Acur
Nutrient split
2 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi has 47.0 kcal. The difference is 32.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 65. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 865 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 43 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.11 mg | +307.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.11 mg | +233.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.024 mg | -40.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | 0.11 mg | +168.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 18.8 mg | +571.4% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 0.47 mg | +67.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 2.5 g | +400.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 59 mg | +145.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 50 mg | +212.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 8.35 g | +130.0% |
| Kül | — | 0.65 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 44 mg | +238.5% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | 0.21 mg | +165.8% |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 1.18 mg | +1104.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 240 mg | +63.3% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 2.8 g | +330.8% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 4 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 89.1 g | -6.4% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 62 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.4 g | +263.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.37 mg | +85.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 47 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Acur has 0.098 mg and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi has 1.18 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi 65.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.