Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
31 kcal
Score
83 / 100
Acur has a higher nutrition quality score (85) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 31(+106.7%)
Score Diff
85 vs 83(-2.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acur
Higher energy
Çalı Fasulye
Score leader
Acur
Nutrient split
1 - 20 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Çalı Fasulye are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Çalı Fasulye has 31.0 kcal. The difference is 16.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 83. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Çalı Fasulye | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 35 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.082 mg | +203.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.104 mg | +215.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.141 mg | +252.5% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | 379 µg | +742.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 12.2 mg | +335.7% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 1.03 mg | +267.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 2.7 g | +440.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 33 µg | +371.4% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 38 mg | +58.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | 43 µg | +162.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 37 mg | +131.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 6.97 g | +92.0% |
| Kül | — | 0.66 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 25 mg | +92.3% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.74 mg | +655.1% |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 211 mg | +43.5% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 1.83 g | +181.5% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 6 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 90.3 g | -5.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.05 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.22 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | 3.26 g | +95.2% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.24 mg | +20.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Çalı Fasulye.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 31 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Acur has 45 µg and Çalı Fasulye has 379 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Çalı Fasulye 83.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.