Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
22 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Cranberry sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
151 vs 22(-85.4%)
Score Diff
30 vs 23(-23.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Cranberry sosu
Higher energy
Cranberry sosu
Score leader
Cranberry sosu
Nutrient split
2 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Cranberry sosu and Acı sos are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Cranberry sosu has 151.0 kcal and Acı sos has 22.0 kcal. The difference is 129.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Cranberry sosu | Acı sos | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 42 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.018 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.025 mg | 0.16 mg | +540.0% |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 498 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.5 mg | 34.8 mg | +673.3% |
| Demir | 0.26 mg | 0.48 mg | +84.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 1.4 g | +27.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.72 mg | 1.45 mg | +101.4% |
| Enerji | 632 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 151 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 5 mg | 18 mg | +260.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.9 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 14 mg | +133.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.9 g | 3.7 g | -90.5% |
| Kül | 0.25 g | 5.73 g | +2192.0% |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 11 mg | +266.7% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.14 mg | 0.82 mg | +485.7% |
| Potasyum | 35 mg | 164 mg | +368.6% |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.95 g | +375.0% |
| Sodyum | 24 mg | 2640 mg | +10900.0% |
| Su | 60.3 g | 89.2 g | +47.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | 10 µg | +900.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.15 g | 0.42 g | +180.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 34.6 g | 2.1 g | -93.9% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.22 mg | +175.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Cranberry sosu and Acı sos.
Acı sos has less energy per 100 g (22 kcal versus 151 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Cranberry sosu has 24 mg and Acı sos has 2640 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Cranberry sosu 30, Acı sos 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.