Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
284 kcal
Score
39 / 100
Acı paprika has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 284(+0.7%)
Score Diff
71 vs 39(-45.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı paprika
Higher energy
Tonka fasulyesi
Score leader
Acı paprika
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Tonka fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Tonka fasulyesi has 284.0 kcal. The difference is 2.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 39. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Tonka fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.16 mg | -51.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 0.11 mg | -91.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.82 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 0.4 mg | -55.6% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 4.2 mg | -80.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 24.1 g | -30.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | 312 mg | -0.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 185 mg | +4.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 38.5 g | -28.7% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | 2.6 g | -66.7% |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 168 mg | -5.6% |
| Mangan | — | 1.15 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | 1.75 mg | -82.6% |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 745 mg | -67.3% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 12.4 g | -12.3% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 14 mg | -53.3% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 8.2 g | +1.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3.4 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 7.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 18.2 g | +41.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 6.5 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 2.9 mg | -33.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Tonka fasulyesi.
Acı paprika has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 284 kcal).
For measured B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin), Acı paprika has 1.23 mg and Tonka fasulyesi has 0.11 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Tonka fasulyesi 39.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.