Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
316 kcal
Score
54 / 100
Acı paprika has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 316(+12.1%)
Score Diff
71 vs 54(-23.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı paprika
Higher energy
Sumak (Tane/Toz)
Score leader
Acı paprika
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Sumak (Tane/Toz) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Sumak (Tane/Toz) has 316.0 kcal. The difference is 34.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 54. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Sumak (Tane/Toz) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.16 mg | -51.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 0.24 mg | -80.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | 0.19 mg | -90.9% |
| Bakir | — | 0.42 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 38.5 mg | +4177.8% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 13.5 mg | -36.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 38 g | +9.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | 125 mg | -60.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 315 mg | +78.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 58.2 g | +7.8% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | 5 g | -35.9% |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 88 mg | -50.6% |
| Mangan | — | 1.85 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | 1.75 mg | -82.6% |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 860 mg | -62.3% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 3.5 g | -75.2% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 32 mg | +6.7% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 9.5 g | +18.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.85 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 18 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.25 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 7.8 g | -39.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.15 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 1.45 mg | -66.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Sumak (Tane/Toz).
Acı paprika has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 316 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acı paprika has 0.9 mg and Sumak (Tane/Toz) has 38.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Sumak (Tane/Toz) 54.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.