Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
573 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Susam (Altın Susam) has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
540 vs 573(+6.1%)
Score Diff
26 vs 46(+76.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Susam (Altın Susam)
Higher energy
Susam (Altın Susam)
Score leader
Susam (Altın Susam)
Nutrient split
5 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı kayısı çekirdeği and Susam (Altın Susam) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı kayısı çekirdeği has 540.0 kcal and Susam (Altın Susam) has 573.0 kcal. The difference is 33.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı kayısı çekirdeği | Susam (Altın Susam) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.22 mg | 0.79 mg | +259.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.58 mg | 0.25 mg | -56.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.79 mg | +426.7% |
| Bakir | 1 mg | 4.08 mg | +308.0% |
| Demir | 4.5 mg | 14.55 mg | +223.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 8 g | 11.8 g | +47.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 4.3 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 97 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 500 mg | 629 mg | +25.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 230 mg | 975 mg | +323.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15 g | 23.45 g | +56.3% |
| Kül | 3 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 240 mg | 351 mg | +46.3% |
| Mangan | 1.8 mg | 2.46 mg | +36.7% |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 4.52 mg | +222.9% |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 468 mg | -28.0% |
| Protein | 25 g | 17.73 g | -29.1% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 11 mg | +175.0% |
| Su | 5.4 g | 4.69 g | -13.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.5 g | 6.96 g | +98.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 48 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 31.2 g | 18.76 g | -39.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 47 g | 49.67 g | +5.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 11.1 g | 21.77 g | +96.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.3 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 7.75 mg | +89.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı kayısı çekirdeği and Susam (Altın Susam).
Acı kayısı çekirdeği has less energy per 100 g (540 kcal versus 573 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Acı kayısı çekirdeği has 0.15 mg and Susam (Altın Susam) has 0.79 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı kayısı çekirdeği 26, Susam (Altın Susam) 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.