Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
133 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
375 vs 133(-64.5%)
Score Diff
38 vs —
Higher energy
Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu)
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
7 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) and Silk fındık Kreması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) has 375.0 kcal and Silk fındık Kreması has 133.0 kcal. The difference is 242.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
9 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) | Silk fındık Kreması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 0 iu | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.64 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.352 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.02 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 200 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.36 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 28.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji | — | 556 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 440 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 179 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 40.22 g | 20 g | -50.3% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 5.07 g | 0.38 g | -92.5% |
| Magnezyum | 198 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 2.37 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1013 mg | — | — |
| Protein | 36.17 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.15 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 15 mg | 67 mg | +346.7% |
| Su | 8.8 g | 72.95 g | +729.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 355 µg | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 9.74 g | 6.67 g | -31.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 20 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.75 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) and Silk fındık Kreması.
Silk fındık Kreması has less energy per 100 g (133 kcal versus 375 kcal).
For measured Su, Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) has 8.8 g and Silk fındık Kreması has 72.95 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) 38, Silk fındık Kreması —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Acı Bakla Unu (Lupin Unu) · Silk fındık Kreması · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.