Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
274 kcal
Score
60 / 100
Zanzibar Karanfili has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 274(-26.5%)
Score Diff
43 vs 60(+39.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Zanzibar Karanfili
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Zanzibar Karanfili
Nutrient split
11 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Zanzibar Karanfili are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Zanzibar Karanfili has 274.0 kcal. The difference is 99.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Zanzibar Karanfili | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | 8 µg | -92.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.158 mg | -36.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 0.22 mg | -45.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.39 mg | +11.4% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 0.2 mg | -90.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 11.83 mg | +82.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 33.9 g | +105.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | 274 kcal | -26.5% |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 104 mg | -58.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 141.8 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 632 mg | +78.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 65.53 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 259 mg | -7.5% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 1.56 mg | -48.0% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 1020 mg | -18.4% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 5.97 g | -53.6% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 273 mg | +1265.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 9.87 g | +23.4% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 25 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 13 g | +5.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.38 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 2.32 mg | -7.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Zanzibar Karanfili.
Zanzibar Karanfili has less energy per 100 g (274 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Achiote has 20 mg and Zanzibar Karanfili has 273 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Zanzibar Karanfili 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.