Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
255 kcal
Score
59 / 100
Yeşil Tane Biber has a higher nutrition quality score (59) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 255(-31.6%)
Score Diff
43 vs 59(+37.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil Tane Biber
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Yeşil Tane Biber
Nutrient split
11 - 8 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Yeşil Tane Biber are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Yeşil Tane Biber has 255.0 kcal. The difference is 118.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 59. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Yeşil Tane Biber | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.11 mg | -56.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 0.18 mg | -55.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.29 mg | -17.1% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 1.15 mg | +130.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | 310 µg | -74.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 12 mg | +500.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 11.2 mg | +72.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 26.2 g | +58.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | 1.04 mg | +108.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 170 mg | -32.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 163.7 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 430 mg | +21.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 64.8 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | 4.2 g | -35.2% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 160 mg | -42.9% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | 5.4 mg | +260.0% |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 1.14 mg | -62.0% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 1250 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 10.4 g | -19.1% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 20 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 10.5 g | +31.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.68 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 17 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.74 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 2.1 g | -83.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.61 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 1.2 mg | -52.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Yeşil Tane Biber.
Yeşil Tane Biber has less energy per 100 g (255 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Achiote has 2 mg and Yeşil Tane Biber has 12 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Yeşil Tane Biber 59.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.