Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
241 kcal
Score
78 / 100
Papatya Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 241(-35.4%)
Score Diff
43 vs 78(+81.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Papatya Tozu
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Papatya Tozu
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Papatya Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Papatya Tozu has 241.0 kcal. The difference is 132.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 78. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Papatya Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.15 mg | -40.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 0.4 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.45 mg | +28.6% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 1.1 mg | +120.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | 350 µg | -70.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 18 mg | +800.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 22.5 mg | +246.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 41.2 g | +149.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 190 mg | -24.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 750 mg | +111.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 67.8 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | 8 g | +23.5% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 240 mg | -14.3% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | 4.5 mg | +200.0% |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 1.2 mg | -60.0% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 1600 mg | +28.0% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 9.6 g | -25.3% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 78 mg | +290.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 8 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 120 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 3.4 g | -72.5% |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 3.2 mg | +28.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Papatya Tozu.
Papatya Tozu has less energy per 100 g (241 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Achiote has 2 mg and Papatya Tozu has 18 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Papatya Tozu 78.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.