Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
154 kcal
Score
47 / 100
Kuru limon kabuğu has a higher nutrition quality score (47) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
373 vs 154(-58.7%)
Score Diff
43 vs 47(+9.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru limon kabuğu
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Kuru limon kabuğu
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Achiote and Kuru limon kabuğu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Achiote has 373.0 kcal and Kuru limon kabuğu has 154.0 kcal. The difference is 219.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 47. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Achiote | Kuru limon kabuğu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 160 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 100 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.25 mg | 0.18 mg | -28.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 0.22 mg | -45.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.38 mg | +8.6% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.32 mg | -36.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 165 mg | +8150.0% |
| Demir | 6.5 mg | 2.4 mg | -63.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.5 g | 32 g | +93.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 373 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 250 mg | 38 mg | -84.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 355 mg | 410 mg | +15.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 72.5 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 60.3 g | — | — |
| Kül | 6.48 g | 3.2 g | -50.6% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 42 mg | -85.0% |
| Mangan | 1.5 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 3 mg | 0.95 mg | -68.3% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 480 mg | -61.6% |
| Protein | 12.86 g | 4.8 g | -62.7% |
| Selenyum | 5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 18 mg | -10.0% |
| Su | 8 g | 10.5 g | +31.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.36 g | 1.2 g | -90.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 14.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 0.6 mg | -76.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Achiote and Kuru limon kabuğu.
Kuru limon kabuğu has less energy per 100 g (154 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Achiote has 2 mg and Kuru limon kabuğu has 165 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Achiote 43, Kuru limon kabuğu 47.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.