Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
42 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Acai Berry has a higher nutrition quality score (40) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
70 vs 42(-40.0%)
Score Diff
40 vs 23(-42.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acai Berry
Higher energy
Acai Berry
Score leader
Acai Berry
Nutrient split
12 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acai Berry and Nashi armudu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acai Berry has 70.0 kcal and Nashi armudu has 42.0 kcal. The difference is 28.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acai Berry | Nashi armudu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.009 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.022 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.046 mg | -69.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9 mg | 3.8 mg | -57.8% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.1 mg | -91.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 3.6 g | +2.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.5 mg | 0.12 mg | -92.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 6 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 11 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.5 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 4 mg | -88.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4 g | 10.65 g | +166.3% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | 0.34 g | -57.5% |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 8 mg | -60.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.7 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.219 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 130 mg | 121 mg | -6.9% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.5 g | -58.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 85 g | 88.25 g | +3.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5 g | 0.23 g | -95.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | 7.05 g | +1310.0% |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.02 mg | -93.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acai Berry and Nashi armudu.
Nashi armudu has less energy per 100 g (42 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Acai Berry has 0.5 g and Nashi armudu has 7.05 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acai Berry 40, Nashi armudu 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.