Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
57 kcal
Score
31 / 100
Abiyuch, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
69 vs 57(-17.4%)
Score Diff
57 vs 31(-45.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Higher energy
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Score leader
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Nutrient split
17 - 8 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Abiyuch, Çiğ and Üzüm, Muscadine, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Abiyuch, Çiğ has 69.0 kcal and Üzüm, Muscadine, Çiğ has 57.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 57 and 31. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
27 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Abiyuch, Çiğ | Üzüm - Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 100 iu | 67 iu | -33.0% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5 µg | 3 µg | -40.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 1.5 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.06 mg | 0.12 mg | +100.0% |
| Besin folati | — | 2 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 60 µg | 39 µg | -35.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 1 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 54.1 mg | 6.5 mg | -88.0% |
| Demir | 1.61 mg | 0.26 mg | -83.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.3 g | 3.9 g | -26.4% |
| Enerji | 290 kj | 57 kj | -80.3% |
| Fosfor | 47 mg | 24 mg | -48.9% |
| Fruktoz | 3.8 g | 3.92 g | +3.2% |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 4.5 g | 3.67 g | -18.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 8 mg | 37 mg | +362.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.6 g | 13.93 g | -20.9% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | 0.5 g | -44.4% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 64 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 14 mg | -41.7% |
| Maltoz | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Mangan | 0.18 mg | 1.97 mg | +994.4% |
| Potasyum | 304 mg | 203 mg | -33.2% |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.81 g | -46.0% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0.05 g | 0.57 g | +1040.0% |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 1 mg | -95.0% |
| Su | 79.9 g | 84.29 g | +5.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 2 µg | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.47 g | +370.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 8.55 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.31 mg | 0.11 mg | -64.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Abiyuch, Çiğ and Üzüm, Muscadine, Çiğ.
Üzüm - Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 69 kcal).
For measured Sakkaroz, Abiyuch, Çiğ has 0.05 g and Üzüm - Çiğ has 0.57 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Abiyuch, Çiğ 57, Üzüm - Çiğ 31.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.