Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
296 kcal
Score
24 / 100
A2 sütü has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
61 vs 296(+385.3%)
Score Diff
34 vs 24(-29.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
A2 sütü
Higher energy
Paneer
Score leader
A2 sütü
Nutrient split
6 - 14 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
A2 sütü and Paneer are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, A2 sütü has 61.0 kcal and Paneer has 296.0 kcal. The difference is 235.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 34 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | A2 sütü | Paneer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 195 µg | +596.4% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.45 µg | 0.95 µg | +111.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.28 mg | +55.6% |
| Demir | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 18 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 84 mg | 360 mg | +328.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 113 mg | 480 mg | +324.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.65 g | 3.6 g | -22.6% |
| Kolesterol | 10 mg | 68 mg | +580.0% |
| Kül | 0.72 g | 1.8 g | +150.0% |
| Laktoz | 4.81 g | 2.8 g | -41.8% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 21 mg | +110.0% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 120 mg | -9.1% |
| Protein | 3.28 g | 18.3 g | +457.9% |
| Sodyum | 40 mg | 22 mg | -45.0% |
| Su | 88.13 g | 53.8 g | -39.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.86 g | 14.2 g | +663.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.81 g | 6.4 g | +690.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.25 g | 22.5 g | +592.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 0.8 g | +566.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.81 g | 2.8 g | -41.8% |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 2.6 mg | +584.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between A2 sütü and Paneer.
A2 sütü has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 296 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, A2 sütü has 0.81 g and Paneer has 6.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: A2 sütü 34, Paneer 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
A2 sütü · Paneer · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.